When I was fifteen I studied library books on Victorian houses so I could design one of my own. It was three stories, situated on a slope so the basement opened at ground level in the back. In addition to the three floor plans, I drew a side elevation to illustrate the slope and a front elevation with all the detailed decor you would expect on that kind of house (which I now know to be Queen Anne Style).
A few months later I turned it in to my French teacher as a class project (to design our dream house and label the rooms in French). For weeks I was too shy to ask for it back. Finally, the last week of class, I summoned the courage to ask--she'd already thrown it away.
I don't know if I've ever suffered such heartbreak, before or since.
That is the sad history of my first experience with 19th century architecture. Once I went to college though, things started looking up. The Victorian age was the age of revivals, of which Queen Anne is one. Parallel to this and other revivals was the Arts & Crafts Movement (around 1860-1910). I don't remember which class introduced me to it, but I know that lecture was a mental drool-fest.
Here's what I recall (with a little help from Wikipedia) about the origin of the movement: inspired by the neo-Gothic writings of John Ruskin and the art of pre-Raphaelite painters, it was led by artists such as William Morris, in response to the consumerism and mass production of the Industrial Revolution. I remember my professor showing a Victorian table, such as this one:
Ornate, isn't it? A picturesque antique, very expensive. Guess what it's made of--paper mache. A whiff of air could almost destroy it. The founders of the Arts & Crafts Movement promoted a return to hand craftsmanship, ordinary materials, and attention to detail and quality, as opposed to cheap, gaudy ornamentation and the grand aesthetic statements of revived Classicism. Although Arts & Crafts textiles were often decorated with organic forms inspired by the Medievalism of the Gothic Revival, its built objects avoided superfluous, artificial decoration, sticking with the purity of the materials and construction method used.
The Arts & Crafts movement extends from fabrics, tile, ceramics, metalwork, and furniture, to architecture. There were several sub-movements of Arts & Crafts architecture, all the way down to Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie School, but I'll get to it's North American application in another post. The Arts & Crafts Movement bred the Art Nouveau style, Antoni Gaudi's Catalan Modernisme (another future post, because I adore Gaudi) and Charles Rennie Mackintosh's Glasgow School. It even informed the stark geometric purity of Modernism.
The poster child for Arts & Crafts architecture is the Red House near London, designed for William Morris himself by architect Philip Webb in 1859.
The front exhibits a clear Gothic influence in the high pitched roof and tall lateral windows...
...while the overall effect has an organic, vernacular feel to it from the texture of its materials and asymmetrical construction, to its integration with the garden outdoors.
The structure of every window frame is evident in the brickwork.
And of course there's the flourish of stained glass.
Isn't Arts & Crafts architecture full of awesome? It borrows some basic aesthetic forms of a historical period, but also interprets the period's inherent structural purity to catalyze a new era of thinking in design. (This is, I think, what so outraged Louis Sullivan about Howells and Hood's design for the Chicago Tribune Tower [see the post I wrote two years ago]--it used Gothic forms without maintaining their structural importance. The historical style was ripped and re-plastered, relegated to nothing but ornamentation.)
Stay tuned for at least two more posts on the offshoots of the Arts & Crafts Movement!
A few months later I turned it in to my French teacher as a class project (to design our dream house and label the rooms in French). For weeks I was too shy to ask for it back. Finally, the last week of class, I summoned the courage to ask--she'd already thrown it away.
I don't know if I've ever suffered such heartbreak, before or since.
**********************
That is the sad history of my first experience with 19th century architecture. Once I went to college though, things started looking up. The Victorian age was the age of revivals, of which Queen Anne is one. Parallel to this and other revivals was the Arts & Crafts Movement (around 1860-1910). I don't remember which class introduced me to it, but I know that lecture was a mental drool-fest.
Here's what I recall (with a little help from Wikipedia) about the origin of the movement: inspired by the neo-Gothic writings of John Ruskin and the art of pre-Raphaelite painters, it was led by artists such as William Morris, in response to the consumerism and mass production of the Industrial Revolution. I remember my professor showing a Victorian table, such as this one:
![]() | ||
| source: http://antiquecat.davidweatherford.com |
![]() |
| A William Morris textile, source: Wikipedia.org |
![]() |
| Gamble House stairwell, source: http://cwis.usc.edu/ |
The Arts & Crafts movement extends from fabrics, tile, ceramics, metalwork, and furniture, to architecture. There were several sub-movements of Arts & Crafts architecture, all the way down to Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie School, but I'll get to it's North American application in another post. The Arts & Crafts Movement bred the Art Nouveau style, Antoni Gaudi's Catalan Modernisme (another future post, because I adore Gaudi) and Charles Rennie Mackintosh's Glasgow School. It even informed the stark geometric purity of Modernism.
The poster child for Arts & Crafts architecture is the Red House near London, designed for William Morris himself by architect Philip Webb in 1859.
![]() |
| source: http://www.geolocation.ws/v/P/51929534/the-red-house/en |
The front exhibits a clear Gothic influence in the high pitched roof and tall lateral windows...
![]() |
| source: http://www.mariabuszek.com |
...while the overall effect has an organic, vernacular feel to it from the texture of its materials and asymmetrical construction, to its integration with the garden outdoors.
![]() |
| source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pomphorhynchus/ |
The structure of every window frame is evident in the brickwork.
![]() |
| source: http://www.williammorristile.com |
And of course there's the flourish of stained glass.
Isn't Arts & Crafts architecture full of awesome? It borrows some basic aesthetic forms of a historical period, but also interprets the period's inherent structural purity to catalyze a new era of thinking in design. (This is, I think, what so outraged Louis Sullivan about Howells and Hood's design for the Chicago Tribune Tower [see the post I wrote two years ago]--it used Gothic forms without maintaining their structural importance. The historical style was ripped and re-plastered, relegated to nothing but ornamentation.)
Stay tuned for at least two more posts on the offshoots of the Arts & Crafts Movement!
























